Do all critical aortic stenosis with chest pain need aortic valve replacement? A case report

Main Article Content

Munish Sharma *
Daniel A.N. Mascarenhas
(*) Corresponding Author:
Munish Sharma | munishs1@hotmail.com

Abstract

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) remains the cornerstone of treatment for symptomatic critical aortic stenosis (AS). It is a Class I indication that symptomatic patients with critical AS undergo either surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We present a patient with critical AS and new angina that was managed successfully with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the Right coronary artery. Physicians should consider that not all patients with critical AS and angina necessarily require AVR. Concomitant pathology leading to the symptoms should be carefully ruled out. This leads to a less invasive, cost effective care plan especially in patients with advanced age and comorbidities for which any type of surgical valvular intervention may pose high risk.

Downloads month by month

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Most read articles by the same author(s)